Google faces new discrimination charges

      Source: Xinhua| 2018-01-05 15:03:18|Editor: Yamei
      Video PlayerClose

      SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 4 (Xinhua) -- Google is facing allegations that it underpays female employees of the company's childcare center.

      Heidi Lamar, Google's former employee, alleged in a complaint that female teachers were paid lower salaries than men with fewer qualifications doing the same job at the tech giant.

      Lamar's allegation is part of a revised gender-pay lawsuit filed on Wednesday. The earlier version of this complaint, filed by three other women who also used to work for Google, had been rejected by a judge for being "overly broad."

      The three former employees were engineer, sales and at management post before leaving the tech company.

      Lamar, who had a master degree in teaching and five years experience in similar job before joining Google, said her starting salary was 18.51 U.S. dollars per hour, while at the same time, her male colleague was offered 21 dollars per hour.

      That means his salary was 13 percent higher than hers even though, she alleged, he had only three years' experience and no master's degree in teaching.

      "The biggest difference was that he's a man," she said. "My first reaction was to immediately feel angry and insulted."

      Lamar said her case was not alone in Google's childcare center. She said she knew of only one woman hired during her time at Google who started at a higher rate than her, and she had over 10 years of experience.

      Google spokeswoman Gina Scigliano said the company disagrees with the "central allegations of this amended lawsuit."

      "Job levels and promotions are determined through rigorous hiring and promotion committees, and must pass multiple levels of review, including checks to make sure there is no bias in these decisions," Scigliano said in a statement.

      The initial version of this lawsuit sought class action status for all women who worked at Google in California for the past four years, and was rejected for being overly broad.

      The amended version proposes a narrower class of plaintiffs that includes engineering, research, management, sales and teaching staff.

      TOP STORIES
      EDITOR’S CHOICE
      MOST VIEWED
      EXPLORE XINHUANET
      010020070750000000000000011103261368742111
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美亚洲国产成人综合在线| 色老头成人免费视频天天综合| 成人禁在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线人成精品一区二区 | gogo全球高清大胆亚洲| 日本电影100禁| 亚洲国产精品无码久久98| 精品久久久久久亚洲综合网| 国产妇乱子伦视频免费| 6一10周岁毛片在线| 好日子在线观看视频大全免费| 久久亚洲精品AB无码播放| 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交极品| 免费又黄又硬又爽大片| 青春草在线视频观看| 国产精品免费视频一区| chinese18国产高清| 我要打飞华人永久免费| 久久青草精品38国产| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区三区| 免费看特级淫片日本| 菠萝蜜亏亏带痛声的视频| 国产欧美日韩另类一区乌克兰| 91麻豆黑人国产对白在线观看| 少妇激情av一区二区| 国产毛片哪里有| 免费v片视频在线观看视频| 久久精品人人做人人爽| 一级视频免费观看| 97热久久免费频精品99| 日韩a视频在线观看| 亚洲人成影院77777| 污污视频网站免费在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区久久| 久碰人澡人澡人澡人澡人视频| 国产综合精品一区二区三区| eeuss影院在线观看| 成人欧美日韩一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品视频| 最近中文字幕的在线mv视频| 亚洲激情电影在线|